Skip to main content

Does trust encourage or discourage employees to share their suggestions? Research suggests the answer depends on the “types” of trust being measured.

The positive effects of employees’ trust in their supervisors have been widely documented, such as job engagement, performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Given supervisors’ authority in the workplace, we suspect supervisors would bear a critical role in initiating trusting supervisor-employee relationships. As suggested in the social exchange theory, employees may perceive supervisor trust in them as a kind act by the supervisor and feel obligated to return such a kind act with their trust in supervisor. 

 

The Research 

 

To examine the relationships among (supervisor) trust in employee, (employee) felt trust, and (employee) trust in supervisor with empirical data, I worked with Drs. Yung-Kuei Huang at National Ilan University in Taiwan and Ning-Kuang Chuang at Kent State University on a project. Our purpose is two-fold.  

 

1.    To examine the mediating relationships among trust in employee, felt trust, and trust in supervisor with two-dimensional measures:

  1. Reliance-based trust intentions --- trustors’ willingness to rely on trustees’ knowledge, skills, and abilities;
  2. Disclosure-based trust intentions --- trustors’ disclosure of sensitive or personal information to trustees. 

 

2.    To investigate the direct and indirect effects of the above trust-related variables on customer-focused voice and silence. 

  1. Customer-focused voice --- employees’ efforts to provide constructive suggestions to management with the intent to address customer needs and improve service quality and procedures;
  2. Customer-focused silence --- employees intentionally withhold information, ideas, and concerns that may be potentially important for the improvement or medication of customer services.  

 

We employed structured equation modeling with 307 valid paired supervisor-employee questionnaires from 32 hotels in Taiwan to test the hypotheses. We then published the results in the International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

 

The Key Findings

 

Besides the reciprocity of trust between supervisor trust in employee and employee trust in supervisor, we also discovered some key interesting findings about employees’ customer-focused voice and silence behaviors:  

 

  1. (Supervisor) reliance-based trust in employee has a significantly positive effect on voice but not silence. 
  2. (Employee) felt reliance positively affects voice but negatively affects silence.
  3. (Employee) felt disclosure has no impact on voice but positively affects silence.
  4. (Employee) reliance-based trust in supervisor negatively affects voice. 
  5. (Employee) disclosure-based trust in supervisor positively affects voice and negatively affects silence. 

 

Is relying on employees better than disclosing sensitive information to employees? 

 

It appears that supervisor reliance-based trust in employee can trigger employees’ feeling of being trusted by their supervisor. Then, when employees feel their supervisors rely on them, they would trust their supervisors in return. Furthermore, when supervisors rely more on employees at work, employees become more likely to provide constructive feedback and suggestions for service improvement. 

 

It is noteworthy to mention that when employees feel their supervisors disclose more sensitive and personal information, they become more likely to withhold their suggestions (i.e., to remain silent). It makes sense that employees might feel reluctant to provide suggestions or inputs when they see their supervisors often share personal and sensitive information with others. 

 

Our results indicate that employees will trust their supervisors more when their supervisors delegate more important tasks to them but not as much when their supervisors disclose too much personal or sensitive information to them. Accordingly, we present the following:  

 

Recommendations for Managers and Supervisors

 

  • Assign employees important tasks and give them decision latitude and autonomy to convey a stronger message of their trust in employees. 
  • At the same time, avoid overly delegating the number of important tasks.  
  • Establish a boundary with their subordinate, allowing them to better manage the amount and content of the personal/sensitive information shared with the employees. 
  • Actively welcome suggestions and inputs from frontline employees to minimize the negative effect of overly delegating important tasks on employee voice. 
  • Clearly and openly express their confidence and positive expectations about employees because employees also need to “feel” the trust before returning supervisors’ trust in them with their trust in supervisors. 

 

The Conclusion

 

No study is perfect or free from potential bias. While there are limitations, our work suggests that we must treat reliance-based trust differently from disclosure-based trust in future studies and practices about “trust” at work. Different trust-related variables can trigger psychological responses unique to customer-focused silence and voice. 

 

In what way do you see the differences between reliance- and disclosure-based trust? What best practices do you see in promoting employee trust in supervisor? How about best practices in helping employees feel or acknowledge their supervisor trust in them?  


Note: The picture was downloaded from SmallBusiness.co.uk

Comments

  1. I believe that trust does play an important role of improving both the supervisor's and the employee's performance and behavior. However it is the supervisor that must initiate the trust relationship first in order to build that trust going back and forth between the supervisor and the employee. Of course, I also agree that there are only specific types of trust that work. As the article said, I also believe that reliance-based trust works much better than disclosure-based trust, at least to start building the trust. Most of the time, all employees care about is either money or self-improvement. They aren't there to listen to someone's life story or personal problem because to be real, I'm sure all of us already have enough of our own problems in our lives. If anything, if any party resorts to disclosure-based trust first, most likely the other party is just going to be confused. Reliance-based trust is a different story because I think it gives us a bit of that freedom element. We are given a task but we have the freedom to decide how we want to do it. And since we live in a "free world" what kind of person doesn't like freedom? Once employees accomplish these tasks, they will feel rewarded in an experience that they did something without their supervisors telling them how to do so. And the same can be said back to the supervisor. Now that the employees are shown to be reliable, the supervisor would be motivated to show that they are are reliable leader to the employees, since trust isn't something that is one-sided. Only then will disclosure-based trust will have a chance of working. It's not something that is guaranteed that will work but I think disclosure-based trust only works when you are already at a certain level of high trust with someone. Or if anything, it may not even work at all. I think in the end, disclosure-based trust is a very effective trust method yet MOST risky since you have to use it correctly at the right time and level of trust.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Luxury vs. Millennials and Their Technology: The Ritz-Carlton (By Julia Shorr)

Embodying the finest luxury experience, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC has been established since 1983. In 1998, Marriott International purchased the brand offering it more opportunity for growth while being independently owned and operated. They are known for their enhanced service level as the motto states, “Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen”. The luxury brand now carries 97 hotels and resorts internationally and is attempting to keep the aspects of luxury while keeping up with the trends of the technologically improving generations. The Varying Demographics of the Target Market The Ritz-Carlton’s typical target market includes: business executives, corporate, leisure travelers, typically middle-aged persons and elders, and families from the upper and upper-middle class section of society .   This infers a large range of types of travelers in which all are similar in that they are not opposed to spending extra for the luxurious ambiance. However, w...

How to Convince AI that You Are the Best Candidate for the Job

Last week, we discussed how more companies used AI to screen resumes and analyze job candidates’ performance in the initial interviews. We called for companies’ attention to the  potential AI biases in hiring . This week, we will visit what job candidates can do to help AI pick us and recommend us for hiring. A. Writing a Resume Tailored to AI Screening First and foremost, job candidates must thoroughly research the job and the company to understand its job descriptions and organizational culture. From there, they can: Write the resume in Word and submit it as a Word document instead of a PDF file. Select a straightforward format and avoid using graphics, charts, or complex layouts that could confuse AI. Use headings effectively to help AI pick up the content it seeks, such as “Relevant Job Experience” and “Education.” Strategically pick the relevant keywords that match the job descriptions as the job candidates describe what they perform(ed) at work. Highlight their achievements a...

What Shall We Do When Job Seekers Cheat the AI Hiring Systems?

AI can streamline the hiring process, but concerns linger. For example, AI could perpetuate gender or racial biases in the hiring process , just like most human HR managers could do. Meanwhile, to increase the chances of being picked by AI, job candidates must prepare resumes and job interviews tailored to AI’s “preference.” When more job candidates understand how to convince AI that they are the best candidates for the job , can AI still make valid recommendations to hire the best-fit candidate in the pool? Then, if AI makes a mix of valid and invalid recommendations for hiring, will HR managers find it more challenging to select the right candidate for the job? The situation can get even more complicated if a candidate cheats the AI hiring systems. Cheat to bypass AI screening: Is it the cruelty of human nature? Job candidates are eager to get hired. Career coaches want to help. That is a good thing. Nevertheless, I have seen many free online tutorial videos teaching job candidate...